Decision: 2020.10.22 |
Argument: 2020.09.10 vid. tr. |
Whether Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim based on parties’ indenture, which tracked the language of section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 USC § 77ppp(b)) and provided that bondholder’s right to receive payment or to bring enforcement suit shall not be impaired without holder’s consent; whether collateral trustee was authorized to pursue default remedy of strict foreclosure.
n/a
- The January Session calendar is set.
- Experts Roundup – New Commentary About CNH Diversified v. Cleveland Unlimited.
- Forced Debt for Equity Exchange Outside Bankruptcy Impairs Bondholder Payment Rights.
- Court of Appeals Decision “injects uncertainty into a multi-trillion-dollar corporate debt market.”
- Bondholders cannot be forced to accept workout deal against their consent (CNH Diversified v. Cleveland Unlimited).
- The September Session calendar is set.
- The April / May Session calendar is set.
- Case Summary – CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account, L.P. v. Cleveland Unlimited, Inc.