Decision: 2020.04.02 |
Argument: 2020.01.07 vid. tr. |
Tenants’ claim of rent overcharge by landlord allegedly taking advantage of luxury decontrol provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law while simultaneously receiving tax incentives under the City of New York’s J-51 program–whether Supreme Court abused its discretion in determining that most of plaintiffs’ claims were within the specialized expertise of the New York State Division Housing and Community Renewal and dismissing those claims under the primary jurisdiction doctrine.
Respondents’ Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus – Rent Stabilization Ass’n of NYC
Amicus – Legal Aid Society
Amicus – Consumer Advocacy Organizations
Amicus – OAG / NYS DHCR
Amicus Response – Respondents to OAG / NYS DHCR
Amicus Response – Respondents to Legal Aid Society et al.
Amicus Response – Respondents to Consumer Advocacy Organizations
Appellants’ Supplemental Brief
Respondents’ Supplemental Brief
Letter Brief – Appellants
Amicus Brief – Lawrence Chaifetz et al.
Amicus Response – Respondents to Chaifetz et al.