Decision: 2020.03.07 |
Argument: 2020.04.00 SUBMISSION |
Whether Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h; plaintiffs demanded that each plaintiff be permitted to be present while other testified at § 50-h hearing and municipal defendants refused, resulting in § 50-h hearing not being conducted; whether General Municipal Law § 50-h permits municipal defendants to exclude one claimant from the examination of another claimant.
n/a
n/a