| Decision: n/a |
| Argument: n/a vid. tr. |
Whether a party can satisfy the open, notorious, and hostile elements of adverse possession when he held only a one-half interest in real property as a co-tenant in common and was unaware for more than twenty years that he was not in exclusive possession of the property because of his own failure to conduct a reasonable investigation after inheriting his interest; what standard applies to an administrator conducting a “reasonable heir” search in the age of the internet when he does not know he is the sole heir; whether an administrator breaches a fiduciary duty by failing to conduct a proper “reasonable-heir” search.
Appellant’s Brief
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief