| Decision: 2022.06.14 |
| Argument: 2022.05.18 vid. tr. |
Whether the writ of habeas corpus is available to a nonhuman animal.
Respondents’ Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus Brief – Martha Nussbaum
Amicus Brief – Protect the Harvest et al.
Amicus Brief – Peter Singer et al.
Amicus Brief – Panicker Radhakrishnan
Amicus Brief – Edwin Cameron
Amicus Brief – Richard Cupp Jr.
Amicus Brief – Animal Theology Experts
Amicus Brief – Animal Legal Defense Fund
Amicus Brief – Philosophers
Amicus Brief – N.Y. Farm Bureau
Amicus Brief – Jewish Scholars
Amicus Brief – Catholic Theologians
Amicus Brief – Maneesha Deckha
Amicus Brief – Association of Zoos and Aquariums
Amicus Brief – Eastern Orthodox Theologians
Amicus Brief – Buddhist Scholars
Amicus Brief – Shannon Minter et ano.
Amicus Brief – Christine Korsgaard
Amicus Brief – Laurence Tribe et al.
Amicus Brief – Law Professors
Amicus Brief – Habeas Corpus Experts
Amicus Brief – American Veterinary Medical Association et al.
Appellant’s Amicus Response – Protect The Harvest
Appellant’s Amicus Response – N.Y. Farm Bureau
Appellant’s Amicus Response – American Veterinary Medical Association
Appellant’s Amicus Response – Association of Zoos
Respondent’s Amicus Response – Laurence Tribe et al.
Respondent’s Amicus Response – Omnibus