Decision: 2020.03.24 |
Argument: 2020.02.11 vid. tr. |
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit certified the following questions:
Where a contract of insurance is negotiated by sophisticated parties such as the City of New York and an insurance company, and where hundreds of thousands of City employees and retirees are third-party beneficiaries of that contract, and where the insurance company’s policy created pursuant to the contract is one of several health insurance policies from which employees and retirees can select, has the insurance company engaged in ‘consumer-oriented conduct’ under [General Obligations Law §§ 349, 350] when:
1. The insurance company drafts summary plan information that allegedly contains materially misleading misrepresentations and/or omissions about the coverage and benefits of the insurance policy and sends these summary materials to the City, and the City does not check or edit these materials before sending them on to the City employees and retirees; OR
2. The insurance company directs City employees and retirees to information on the insurance company’s website that allegedly contains materially misleading misrepresentations and/or omissions about the coverage and benefits of the insurance policy?