Decision: 2019.11.25 |
Argument: 2019.10.24 vid. tr. |
Whether the Court of Claims properly concluded that the State was not vicariously liable for the actions of a corrections officer; whether corrections officer, who assaulted inmate, was acting outside the scope of officer’s employment; Pleading–Answer–whether the Court of Claims abused its discretion in allowing State to amend its answer to include affirmative defense.
Lower Court Briefs