Decision: n/a |
Argument: 2024.10.15 vid. tr. |
Whether the courts below properly determined that an agreement to arbitrate existed between plaintiff and Uber; whether the ethical rule prohibiting an attorney from contacted a represented party prevents a corporation from including an agreement to arbitrate a pending lawsuit in its terms of service in its software application; whether it was reasonable for plaintiff to expect that assenting to an update to the application’s terms of use would affect her pending lawsuit in which she was represented by counsel; whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts New York’s law on arbitration clauses; whether the purported agreement was unconscionable; whether Uber may rely on its prior 2016 terms of service.
Appellant’s Brief
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus – [party submitting brief]
Amicus Response – [party responding]
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus – [party submitting brief]
Amicus Response – [party responding]
n/a
Leave Decision
Leave Motion
Leave Opp
Leave Decision
Leave Motion
Leave Opp
1234 Department Leave Decision
1234 Department Decision
Supreme Court Decision
1234 Department Decision
Supreme Court Decision
n/a
Appellant’s Briefs (AD*)
Appellant’s Briefs (AD*)