Decision: 2021.02.18 |
Argument: 2021.01.05 vid. tr. |
Whether mortgagee’s voluntary discontinuance of prior foreclosure action constituted an affirmative act of revocation of its prior election to accelerate the mortgage debt; prior foreclosure action discontinued by so-ordered stipulation, which was silent on issue of revocation of election to accelerate.
Related Cases: Ditech Financial, LLC v. Naidu; Vargas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.; Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Ferrato.
Appellant’s Brief
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus – Legal Services Providers
Amicus Response – Appellant
Respondent’s Brief
Reply Brief
Amicus – Legal Services Providers
Amicus Response – Appellant
n/a
- The Doctrine of Nullification Also Justifies the Result in the Mortgage Acceleration Cases.
- Court of Appeals Issues Four Landmark Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Decisions to Provide Clarity and Consistency Regarding the Statute of Limitations.
- The Court’s Decision Fixes What Wasn’t Broken, Promotes Manipulation of the Judicial System, and Undermines the Purpose of Statutes of Limitations.
- Court clarifies rules on acceleration and de-acceleration of mortgage debt (Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Ferrato; Vargas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.; Ditech Financial, LLC v. Naidu; Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Engel).
- The January Session calendar is set (October 15, 2020).
- Case Summary – Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Engel