Whether respondents rationally determined that the building was a class A multiple dwelling “apartment hotel” and properly classified in the “R-2” occupancy group under the current New York City Building Code, and whether competing evidence raises a question of fact necessitating a hearing on the issue of whether the building’s use is consistent with general safety and public welfare.
Appellants-Respondents’ Brief (NYC)
Appellants-Respondents’ Brief (New Hampton)
Respondents-Appellants’ Brief
Appellants-Respondents’ Reply Brief (NYC)
Appellants-Respondents’ Reply Brief (New Hampton)
Respondents-Appellants’ Supplemental Brief
Appellants-Respondents’ Brief (New Hampton)
Respondents-Appellants’ Brief
Appellants-Respondents’ Reply Brief (NYC)
Appellants-Respondents’ Reply Brief (New Hampton)
Respondents-Appellants’ Supplemental Brief
n/a